My 2 cents about UML

There were some interesting posts about UML recently. Mainly being “ Has UML died without anyone noticing?” and “ Why UML “Really” Died”. I also made some posts about UML in the past — mainly “ UML Hidden Gems” and “ Architecture 101: Thinking about Design” and “ Internal System Design: The Forgotten Discipline “. IMHO success means decline and eventually abuse. That happened to all successful movements, technologies, and methodologies I can remember such as Agile, Architecture, DevOps, Docker, Spring, and many more. Yes UML was abused and used in the context of the heavy and rigid process. UML was often used for all CRUDs which does not make sense and does not add value. But honestly, if we see things with DDD lens even CRUDS don’t make sense especially with UX sense CRUD are not ideal at all. IMHO what happens is we are exposed to fashion and marketing. There is internal and external pressure to do things in one way instead of another. UML had issues yeah for sure I’m not denied that. However, I believe we throw the baby with the bathwater. UML was about making you think about different perspectives. The big issue of everything is not to understand the principles, values, and core foundations of engineering, distributed systems, and Lean/Agile. By doing things we dont understand(and doing them FAST) we create more issues than we fixed. Sam Newman talks about that is his last book “ Monolith to Microservices: Evolutionary Patterns to Transform Your Monolith “ where he describes experiences doing Microservices workshops and people were trying to do Microservices but they did not know why and did not know what problems they were trying to solve.

It’s about Learning

Lean was always about learning. In the classical book “The Goal” Goldratt tells a classical tell about a factory that was doing local optimizations and was not maximizing results and mainly increasing WASTE in the form of inventory and operational expenses. The same issues/fallacies I saw with SOA(Service Oriented Architecture) where one the first wave there was a massive push from vendors to REBRAND solutions to SOA and make people BUY first and think later. IMHO represented by the classical ROI fairy video. The same re-brand tool rush happened with Agile and JIRA(Capture by the parody Jira JR video).

Learning needs to EARNED. It cannot be acquired by a TOOL and by hiring a software vendor or consultant. Proper vendors can help you to accelerate your LEARNING however what often happens is the focus on IT delivery hater than business learning.

It’s about the business

We cannot do software ignoring the business domain. It’s very easy for engineering to focus on CODE problems and forget about business processes and business flow. Our failed attempts to do microservices pushed complexity upwards and create the need for BFF aggregators and even PR coordination nightmares (vide Uber DOMA story).

It’s easy to be trap thinking about if Spring Boot or Quarkus is the best choice and miss how the business change data and how the Domain should evolve, we need more DDD. We need to understand the business. As time pass and we have more and more legacy, even the business experts are rare in several companies and people need to look at the legacy code in order to know what's going on — we went full circle now.

It’s not UML fault — it's about Thinking

IMHO we need to think. We need to have time to think and properly collaborate with the business. UML is a way to force you to think from different perspectives and understand how your domain works. Notation and formalism are not the point and really dont add much value. Thinking is bigger than planning. That’s why we need retrospectives and collaboration with the business.

If we continue doing things we dont understand. If we continue to ignore the business domain. Any tool, Service, or Vendor can save us. We need to break the CONTROL fallacies and embrace complexity, care about people and understand that Learning is the only way forward.

Cheers,

Diego Pacheco

Popular posts from this blog

C Unit Testing with Check

Image
When I start on IT, several years ago(+15), C was the first language that I learned. But was not the first language I mastered and deployed in production which was...surprisingly Visual Basic 6.0. However, when I learned C or any language back on that old and arcane time noddy was into testing. However now is impossible to work professionally in any language without tests. C is a low-level language but still kicks ass and has several interesting libs/frameworks. People use to fear C a lot because of lack of syntactical sugar but once you get used to it is not that hard at all. Today I want to show how you can do Unit Testing with C. I will not show how to do Unit Testing with C++ but with C ANSI actually. We will be using Check a unit test lib for C ANSI.
read more »

Having fun with Zig Language

Image
Zig is a general-purpose language created in 2016 by Andrew Kelly .  Zig aims to fix the issues C language has while being pragmatic and simple at the same time. Zig really shines as being simple by not having any hidden control flows, not having hidden memory allocations, no pre-processors, and no macros. Basically, it's one language and one language only. Since pre-processors and macros can get really complex and become their own universe. Sure it's not the Zig Philosophy.  Zig Compiler(Zig cc) also is a C compiler, and the interoperability from C to Zig is very good. Clearly, we can see influence from other languages like Go and Rust; however, Zig is pretty unique and different from Go and Rust.  Zig is fast. Zig is perfect for system programming. I bet we will see a lot of solutions being built in Zig. As a languages aficionado, I like to learn at least one language per year and sometimes more; Zig was my 2021 pick, did not regret it. Even if you dont use all language...
Keep reading

HMAC in Java

Image
In 2018 AWS CTO(Vogels) said : "Security is everyone's job". For the last 2 years, there was so many famous and big data leaks and breaks that made that statement be very true more than ever. Security often could mean worst performance and worst user experience so in order to get it right you really need to think about the designs before jumping into to code and consider performance and user experience has main requirements.  I was thinking about writing about how to do HMAC in Java for a while and recently Redis 6.0.0 come out and to my surprise, there was a refactoring on the password part in order to use HMAC.  Security easily could scare engineers often because it is not something well spread yet but I believe this will change soon. It does not matter if you have to deal with PII Data or not, security is super relevant because everybody is running their workloads at the cloud or with IoT and Edge devices which means more distribution, more code, more points of fail...
read more »