Small Product Teams are Overrated

 

So if you read my previous post, I saw saying that for Platform / DevOps you dont want to have 1 single team but several small teams actually. However, when we are talking about Product Teams I believe we need to go the other way around. Could we have small teams in the product and yet be a good thing? Well depends. IF the Product teams are completely autonomous and selling their own product or completely independent module in sense of the business (Meaning autonomy is a business construct). Well for that case yes, have smaller and more teams will make sense however in practice what happens is the other way around. What happens is that many small product teams tend to create small microservices with have dependencies on each other and at scale, it becomes more problem they benefit. In order words, business verticals or bigger scoped SOA Services would make much more sense and also would fix several problems that small services at scale tend to create. If you want to know more about current industry issues with microservices read this post here. 

Small Product teams Issues at Scale

When we have so many Small Product Teams making so many microservices at Scale the issues are numerous but we can consider the biggest headaches being:
 * Who is the Owner? People come and Go, who knows that software? Who to talk to? 
 * Coordination: Open PRs to multiple repositories and coordinate deploys across several services.
 * Complexity: When things fail, where is the issue? How to trace it? 

To fix these problems, we need to reduce the comunication blast radius, that can be done by the simple fact: Have fewer Product Teams. Meaning more "Business Verticals" more centralization and more isolation and independence inside the business silo. This idea is completely wrong for DevOps/Platform teams but for Product I believe is actually a good idea and not new at all. Look "Monorepos". 

This sorta the "Monorepo" principle. Things that are the "same" should be together. It will be easier to:
  * Release: Since all together - bump versions is simple.
  * PR Review: All Related code on the same PR rather than multiple PRs.
  * Easy to Maintain: Since is all on the same repo
  * Always Have an owner. 

The industry got it all wrong(mostly). Currently, everybody has Small Product Teams and Centralized DevOps / Platform teams and we need the other way around. Big Centralized Product Teams and Small Platform / DevOps Teams.  

Small Product Teams alone will do nothing for you

Any org can split Product Teams into small(Pizza teams) like amazon. But can you also make the Pizza Teams business independent? (Like Amazon). That the hard part. The business has dependencies, breaking the same thing into multiple places it does not make your life easier, actually, it make much harder because:
  * Multiple Services == Infrastructure / Deployment Complexity
  * Multiple Services == Harder to Debug and Understand (Require Observability)
  * Multiple Services == More complexity, harder to maintain, Who is the owner? 
  * Multiple Services == More coordination, slower execution

Creating small product teams where you dont need it is a huge problem you are creating for you future-self company. Believe me. Lots of big companies are realizing that such as Uber. It's small Product teams always wrong? No. But to be right you need to have business autonomy meaning:
  * Can you have your own business model? 
  * Can you have an independent product or module? 
  * Can you experiment and respond to business metrics and OKRs but yourself alone? 
  * Can you operate alone? Meaning do you need other modules to work? how isolated are you? 

Teams organization and topologies are an amazing and interesting subject. Software Architecture and team organization/topologies walk along since computer science day 0. Conway's law rules. 

Cheers,
Diego Pacheco

Popular posts from this blog

Kafka Streams with Java 15

Image
Kafka Streams is a Streaming library similar to Spark and Flink which works with Apache Kafka. Kafka stream can be useful to process historical and near-real-time big data workloads but also for non-realtime analytical computations at scale for the online world as well. Kafka-Streams is elastic, highly scalable, fault-tolerant, and fully integrated with Kafka. You can use Kafka Stream with Java, Scala, Kotlin JVM applications and also have exactly-once processing semantics. Kafka-Streams is being used by the New York Times, Pinterest, Line, Trivago, Zalando, and many other companies. Today I want to share a video of Kafka-Streams running with Kafka 2.6 and Java JDK 15. So Let's get started. 
read more »

Rust and Java Interoperability

Image
Rust does not stop for one second to amaze me. It looks like Rust was designed to talk to every other language so easily. No kidding, it's clear way Web Assembly and rust have lots in common. Java is never an easy lang to interop with. Today I will show how easily we can interop Java & Rust. In order to do so, we will need to use the Java and Rust compilers. For Java, we will not require any other lib than the standard JDK. For Rust, we will need to create a lib project in cargo and we will need to use the crate JNI. I love this feature because java does not allow low-level code on the main language. So if we need to do something low level, efficiently Rust is my first choice, not only for safety reasons but because is really fast.  Let's get started.
read more »

HMAC in Java

Image
In 2018 AWS CTO(Vogels) said : "Security is everyone's job". For the last 2 years, there was so many famous and big data leaks and breaks that made that statement be very true more than ever. Security often could mean worst performance and worst user experience so in order to get it right you really need to think about the designs before jumping into to code and consider performance and user experience has main requirements.  I was thinking about writing about how to do HMAC in Java for a while and recently Redis 6.0.0 come out and to my surprise, there was a refactoring on the password part in order to use HMAC.  Security easily could scare engineers often because it is not something well spread yet but I believe this will change soon. It does not matter if you have to deal with PII Data or not, security is super relevant because everybody is running their workloads at the cloud or with IoT and Edge devices which means more distribution, more code, more points of fail
read more »